Sherlock was brilliant last Sunday. I’ve been reading and re-reading Conan Doyle’s stories since I was 12, (it was one of the few things that eventually did manage to plug the gap when Doctor Who was cancelled in 1989). I’ve seen a lot of the TV and film adaptations since then – predictably I love the Jeremy Brett series. Some I’ve watched with enjoyment, some… erm… not.
For example, the BBC filmed a new version of the Hound of the Baskervilles in 2002. I was delighted, sat down to watch it on Christmas day… and then spent the rest of the film wincing. Holmes was cast appallingly. The plot was radically altered, although still had the same basics as the novel. The heart did not seem to be in the right place.
Sherlock, though, was incredibly good. It was a really rather faithful take on A Study In Scarlet – although the title of the original came from a line said by Holmes, not sure what the base of A Study In Pink came from. The colour of the tablets maybe?
Sure, there were flaws, I think – the motive of the murderer was very sketchy, and the name of his sponsor pretty predictable. But other than that, it was marvellous. The story was a good enough adaptation of the original, but with great little modern touches – Holmes would certainly have been au fait with the more cutting edge tech available, and the GPS, the text messages, the blogs… all beautiful touches.
The dialogue, as you’d expect from the pen of Steven Moffatt, was sparkling. The characters (and acting) perfectly judged. Benedict Cumberbatch makes a great Holmes, the right mixture of the cerebral and unpredictable genius. Martin Freeman gets a proper, meaty character – unusual for Watson, it’s usually pushed towards the bumbling idiot level. But this Watson is great, strong and intelligent in his own right. He has an eye for the ladies too – witness his persistence in dropping hints to Mycroft’s assistant, even though she barely realises he’s there.
There’s a good atmosphere between them, especially when Watson is asked to choose a side by Mycroft (who is still a stranger to him then), and clearly is puzzled by his instinct to trust Holmes, despite just having been abandoned at a crime scene and made to limp home.

Lestrade is as desperate as is fitting, being both jealously hostile but pathetically needy towards Holmes. Mrs Hudson is very right, too – already seemingly a natural part of the furniture at 221b Baker Street. The Mycroft character is very interesting too – in the books, the brothers view each other in a vaguely amusing manner, occasionally hostile, but nothing to the degree of attempting to pinch each others’ new friends…
Altogether it’s one of the very best adaptations I’ve seen. People will always return to the Brett versions, or the incomparable Basil Rathbone, but the key thing is that this is different, exciting and yet somehow the same, familiar thing. Surely the hallmark of a great adaptation?
Despite the Torchwood connection in this, I still can’t bring myself to watch this one though:
It looks appalling…



